Mating has many of the same strengths as Mortals, the Norman Rush novel I discovered and loved earlier this year. The locale is the same, Botswana, and the narrator is an insecure, self-involved academic who overthinks and filters her experiences through a gauze of literary references. Rush seamlessly combines the story of a romantic relationship between a man and a woman with meditations on the relationship between Western liberal reformers and the Africans they help, discreetly drawing parallels between the two. The partners are more equal in modern relationships, but what aspects of paternalism persist?
Objectively, Mating is the more ambitious book, with a National Book Award to prove it. But even though Mating tosses off more ideas about love and society than Mortals did, I enjoyed it less. Probably because the female narrator's central obsessions -- about the role of (strong) women in relationships -- speak to me less directly than Ray's anxieties about his marriage in Mortals. This middle portion of the book dragged for me.
I'm working my way backwards through Rush's oeuvre. Next will be his first collection of stories, Whites.
Objectively, Mating is the more ambitious book, with a National Book Award to prove it. But even though Mating tosses off more ideas about love and society than Mortals did, I enjoyed it less. Probably because the female narrator's central obsessions -- about the role of (strong) women in relationships -- speak to me less directly than Ray's anxieties about his marriage in Mortals. This middle portion of the book dragged for me.
I'm working my way backwards through Rush's oeuvre. Next will be his first collection of stories, Whites.